What Is Walzer s Theory Of Aggression - 1318 Words

What is Walzer’s â€Å"Theory of Aggression†? According to Michael Wazler, the theory of aggression implies to the ideologies of jus ad bellum as detailed in the international law. He uses domestic correlation as the basis of the theory by explaining how the rules that govern citizens apply to the international community. The rights that apply to the citizens are similar to those of the states. He argues that â€Å"Every violation of the territorial integrity or political sovereignty of an independent state is called aggression† He subdivides the theory into six main points that act as the standards of comprehending war from a moral point of view. †¢ The international community constitutes of independent nations that Wazler uses to demonstrate the concept of a civilized society. †¢ The states that form the international community have rights. The foundation of the rights is the rights guaranteed to persons. †¢ It is a crime for a state to use force against the other. Such actions comprise the state’s rights. †¢ The justification of violence as a means of defending oneself where individuals and states use it as a method of enforcing laws †¢ Hostility serves to validate war †¢ It is possible to punish and ward off aggressors Walzer seeks to point out that when states emphasize on their rights, they must also be (somehow) the objects of punishment How does Walzer modify that theory in the section of the book on â€Å"jus ad bellum,† and why does he feel it needs modification? He uses theShow MoreRelatedThe Issue Of Humanitarian Intervention1534 Words   |  7 Pagescurrent consensus in the international community understands that nations, like individuals, have basic rights, namely, the right to territorial integrity and political sovereignty. When another nation violates these rights, it is considered an act of aggression. However, there certainly are situations where a violation of territorieal integrity or political sovereignty is justified, namely humanitarian intervention, â€Å"thus use of military force against another state when the chief publicly declared aimRead MoreLuban s Critique Of Walzer Conception Of Legitimacy1932 Words   |  8 PagesIn this paper, I will argue that Luban’s critique of Walzer conception of legitimacy is misguided. I will first present Walzer’s argument for interventions using the â€Å"legalist paradigm,† in particular his conception of self-determination and how the principle of non-intervention may be set aside in exceptional circumstances. I will then present Luban’s critique of Walzer and his argument for developing an account of Just War directly in terms of human rights, before concluding with my own critiqueRead MoreThe Issue Of Humanitarian Intervention2145 Words   |  9 PagesThe consensus among the international community affirms that nations, like individuals, have basic rights, namely, the right to territorial integrity and political sovereignty. When another nation violates these rights, it is considered an act of aggression. However, there certainly are situations where a violation of territorial integrity or political sovereignty is justified, namely in humanitarian intervention, â€Å"the use of military force against another state when the chief declared aim of thatRead MoreWas World War Ii a Legitimate War? in the Context of Just War Theory.3960 Words   |  16 Pagesjust war theory. In war some sorts of restraint, both on what we can legitimately fight for (jus ad bellum) and on how we may legitimately fight (jus in bello), are morally required.1 However, recent theorists also add the responsibility and accountability of warring parties after the war (jus post bellum) to the main two categories of just war theory. From Christian perspective the function of the JWT was simply an excuse of making war morally and religiously possible writes Michael Walzer. He alsoRead MoreExplain the Strengths and Weaknesses of One or More Criminological Theories for Explaining Crime in Contemporary Britain2651 Words   |  11 Pagesweaknesses of one or more criminological theories for explaining crime in contemporary Britain Word count:1,200 Outline plan * Explain in brief the purpose of this essay. * Define the biological theory. * Evaluate Lombroso’s theory and link it to contemporary Britain. Include statistical data. * Discuss Charles Goring’s critisms of Lombroso’s theory. * Evaluate Sheldon’s somatypes theory. * Describe and evaluate the biological chromosomes theory. * State how Patria Jacobs’ studyRead MorePOL.355.Final.Paper2418 Words   |  10 PagesTheoretical Approach Just War Theory evolves from three ideas; jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum. Jus ad bellum means justice for war, that is what the motive behind going into war is? This first part concentrates on the reasons why states use war as a means in which to achieve a justifiable end. Jus in bello means justice in war, deals with the means used in the actual war which is normally the soldiers’ responsibility. The last idea used in just war theory is Jus post bellum which meansRead MoreThe Contributions Of John Rawls Essay5959 Words   |  24 Pageswhen his troops visited the remains of Hiroshima, if profound effect on him. Later, he joined the Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, as assistant Professor of Philosophy. In 1962, he was given Professorship at Harvard where he published his ‘Theory of Justice’ in 1971 and was awarded the Phi Beta Kappa Ralph Waldo Emerson prize in 1972. He retired in 1991 but continued teaching political philosophy till 1995 . In 1999, a National Humanitarian Medal was awarded to him by President Clinton and